On Friday afternoon, the CAN TV funding ordinance involving the state franchise that preivously went from good to okay has now somehow gone from okay to just horrible. (It'd be great to know this happened; we'd love to know how our tax dollars are being spent.)
A dispatch from CAN TV is posted below. Read 'em and weep (and stay tuned to CMA for further developments on this neverending story).
*** *** *** *** *** *** ***
We recently asked you to urge support of the Stone/Burke ordinance to fund CAN TV as a first step toward resolving one of the two funding issues facing the organization.
THAT ORDINANCE HAS NOW BEEN CHANGED IN WAYS THAT ARE HARMFUL TO THE FUTURE STABILITY OF CAN TV AND DOES NOT RESOLVE EITHER FUNDING ISSUE.
We've informed the City that we oppose this version of the ordinance. We don't know if it will be introduced or held for further consideration at Monday's meeting.
If the ordinance passes in its current form:
* The ordinance provides no adequate funding solution for CAN TV.
* The 1% PEG fee from all state holders except for AT&T will go to the City.
* Current funding support from Comcast, RCN and WideOpenWest will go to the City should those companies opt into state franchises.
The 3/16/09 meeting will be held at 10am, City Hall, 121 N. LaSalle St., 2nd floor, City Council Chambers.
CAN TV | 312.738.1400 | www.cantv.org | email@example.com
UPDATE: The ordinance passed, and it wasn't pretty to watch. Read all about it.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this
website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media
Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire
membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action
as an organization.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.