Back in 2002 and 2003, the FCC was trying to ram through a series of controversial media ownership rules (and by "controversial" I refer to a subtle division between "those who stood to gain financially by the decision" versus "everyone else who ever lived"). CMA, back in the day, got very quickly involved -- among the very first groups in America to work on the issue, spreading the word on the issue as a key to stopping the rules before they got passed.
What's key to the entire saga is that grassroots activism helped to fuel widespread outrage at a time when NOBODY else did or even knew. This was indirectly acknowledged by the judges in Philadelphia who heard an emergency court order on the day the controversial rules were slated to go into effect; the court granted an emergency stay precisely because a million people spoke up about the issue. Well, how did a million people know about the issue when the major media wasn't breathing nary a word and the FCC was even actively shredding its own research?
When the FCC lost the ensuing court battle, the FCC was forced to press the reset button on the issue, and thus the FCC promised at least six public hearings on the matter across the country. There had been speculation for months (going back as far as January 2007, in fact) that the FCC would be holding one of its hearing in Chicago -- and we found out this week that on September 20, 2007, that will indeed be the case.
The recipe for victory remains the same: Get involved. Spread the word. Come to the hearing to give your Two Minutes' Hate. Stay tuned for further bulletins. And let us know if you have any questions.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this
website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media
Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire
membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action
as an organization.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.