One of the key media policy fights in
the U.S. government in 2006 will concern what's termed "net neutrality" --
the idea that users have freedom of choice and freedom of opportunity on
the internet. It's basically been the bedrock of telephony policy in the
U.S. for the past one hundred twenty years.
But now, the big cable and telecom companies -- you know, the punks who spent the past year trying to strangle community internet initiatives in the crib -- have this big moneymaking idea to set up separate tiers of internet access and grant favored access and speed to those who can pay more. In other words, they want to set up electronic apartheid and give themselves favored status, and have been lobbying and throwing campaign cash with abandon to make it happen with a hoped forthcoming rewrite of the 2006 Telecommunications Act.
But it's not that cut-and-dried among industry types. There are some companies with some clout and some cash -- including Google, Yahoo, eBay, and Microsoft -- which made their money and made their presence thanks to net neutrality, and have expressed an interest in keeping things neutral.
But beyond industry-versus-industry slugfests -- what is cool and especially encouraging is that national-scale activist initiatives to maintain net neutrality have sprouted like mushrooms in the past week. (Hey, you! Click on those links and speak out now!) And calls to keep the internet open are fortunately increasing, and may increase further.
Plus, there's the potential for victories -- just like this past week in Indiana. (UPDATE: I spoke a bit too soon. The struggle is still going on.)
Interesting potential monkey wrench, part one: The leading name to take the last vacancy on the FCC, though he's a Republican stupidhead, has spent a career fighting the Baby Bells.
Interesting potential monkey wrench, part two: Verizon (one of those greedy punk telecom companies) is asking Joe Barton to lay off on the current press to get legislation done. Maybe Verizon thinks Barton is trying to bite off more than he can chew, and as a result he might choke and this might decrease the likelihood of any horrible bill getting passed.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this
website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media
Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire
membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action
as an organization.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.