The embargo is broken...

Posted by Mitchell - May 13, 2003 (entry 38)

In the past week, there have been articles, outside of the business pages, on the FCC's deregulation efforts in the New York Times, and even in the lawsuit-prone Chicago Tribune. The USA Today also chimed in, but kept the matter in their Money section.

People now know about this issue, plus I've found that it's a lot easier to talk about the matter. Even folks with whom I don't agree with politically are interested in the matter once they hear about it.

It sounds like (a) Powell is hell-bent on ramming through some deregulation, which doesn't promise to be good for anyone who isn't on the NAB payroll, and (b) as bad as that is, the call-to-arms that citizens and groups nationwide has raised has changed the calculus so that Powell couldn't just quietly obliterate all of the regulations. Count that as a victory; take what we can get.

Powell will probably leave some of the regulations intact, which means we'll get to go through this dance again in two years, but hopefully with greater public awareness, more empirical evidence as ammunition, and a vibrant independent media sector whose quality of production values and content increasingly puts the mainstream media to shame.

Update. From today's (May 14, 2003) Tom Toles:

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action as an organization.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.