*MEDIA ALERT* Press Contact: Allan Gomez, 312-738-1400
*WHAT:* The Chicago Committee on Finance votes on the ordinance to fund CAN TV introduced by Mayor Daley and Alderman Stone. This ordinance will stem losses from a failed funding structure that is tied to cable competition.
*WHEN:* Monday, November 1 at 10 a.m.
*WHERE: * City Council Chambers, 2nd floor, City Hall, 121 N. LaSalle.
*WHY:* This ordinance proposes a viable solution to help close the funding gap caused by the failure of cable competition in the City of Chicago. The first part of the new ordinance addresses a change in the amusement tax. The second part of the ordinance provides CAN TV with a small percentage of the cable franchise fee that is currently paid to the City by cable companies.
*IN FAVOR:* The majority of Chicago Aldermen on behalf of thousands of constituents citywide. CAN TV supporters.
*OPPOSED:* Comcast has expressed opposition to the first part of the ordinance which calls for a slight decrease in the deduction of Comcast's 5% franchise fee from the 7% amusement tax. Comcast argues that this is unfair, that it will burden its subscribers, and that it will cause a competitive disadvantage in the face of growing competition from satellite providers.
Is the new ordinance unfair to Comcast? Comcast, the largest cable company in Chicago, gets 85% of citywide cable revenues. It pays 58% of CAN TV's cable funding. That only increases to 65% with the addition of franchise fee dollars rerouted to CAN TV.
Will the new ordinance burden Comcast's customers? The change in the amusement tax will result in less than $2.00 per year to Comcast subscribers, or approximately 15 cents per month.
Will the new ordinance cause a competitive disadvantage? According to The Chicago Tribune (March 2004), Comcast holds the lion's share of the market with satellite having only 10%, and competitive cable companies like RCN and WOW holding only 5%.
For more information, go to www.cantv.org.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this
website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media
Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire
membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action
as an organization.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.