In the face of a court defeat on June 24, 2004 which overturned the 2003 changes to media ownership rules, the FCC and corporate lobbyists are fighting back. And they're doing it in what strikes me as a crass manner.
The Tribune (along with Gannett) would rather go back to court than give up its illegal cross-ownership holdings. And the FCC is asking the courts to reconsider its limits on radio ownership, pretty please, pretty pretty please.
It's both annoying and inspiring that these people don't take no for an answer. If they don't take no for an answer, why should we?
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this
website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media
Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire
membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action
as an organization.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.