" End the ban on cross-ownership," reads the headline on today's Chicago Tribune editorial page.
I just fired off a letter to the Tribune (which I went ahead and wrote on my own), which reads as follows:
The Chicago Tribune should heed critics who "howl" against removing the ban on media cross-ownership. We've seen the repeal of ownership restrictions in the radio industry, and the results haven't been pretty: fewer radio owners, staff layoffs despite massive profits, and computerized stations playing prearranged and predictable content.
In its estimate of media ownership matters, the Tribune should consider more and broader gauges of journalism quality. Besides ratings and awards, these gauges should include the number of sources, the diversity of those sources, and the quality of journalistic analysis.
The cross-ownership ban is there not as a restriction against markets but to insure means for diverse media for timely and important communications. Case in point: some 300 people in Minot, North Dakota were hospitalized because of a chemical spill, and police had difficulty alerting those people in time because most of the local media outlets (radio stations, in this case) were owned by a single company--which didn't happen to have anyone on staff at the time of the spill.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this
website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media
Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire
membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action
as an organization.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.